Recently, on a prominent insurance forum, a question was asked regarding the specific deadline for filing an insurance claim in Texas, and how to determine what that deadline might be. Responses varied widely, with only a handful of answers nearing accurate. There are two correct answers to the question: First, claims should be filed as promptly as possible, and second, the applicable hard cutoff deadlines (if there are any) vary based on (1) the type of peril involved and (2) the specific terms outlined within the insurance policy.
The phrase “filing a claim” is often confused with “filing a lawsuit.” This misunderstanding has led many to mistakenly assert that the deadline to file a claim is two years. This assertion is both misleading and vague. It is crucial to replace the term “file the claim” with “provide the carrier with first notice of loss (FNOL).” The key question then shifts to: What is the deadline in Texas for providing the insurance carrier with the first notice of loss?
Generally, every insurance policy includes a section called “Duties in the Event of a Loss.” This section typically contains language stating that the insured is required to “promptly give us [the carrier] notice of the loss or damage.” However, Texas law does not provide a precise definition of what prompt means. Thus, this term can vary significantly depending on the circumstances surrounding each claim. If the first notice of loss is found not to fulfill the prompt notice requirement, the insurance carrier may assert a late-notice defense to deny coverage.
The deadline for providing notice depends on the type of peril and the specific policy provisions. In Texas, insurance policies can include specific language that requires notice of losses caused by wind or hail to be reported within one year of the date the damage occurred. This language is valid and enforceable in Texas. Such provisions are typically found in policy endorsement rather than in the main form of the policy itself. Therefore, if a property has sustained wind or hail damage and the insured does not report this damage within the one-year timeframe outlined in the policy, the carrier will have a solid defense against any claims for coverage if they decide to pursue it.
Now, consider the scenario where notice is not necessarily prompt but is still provided within that one-year timeframe. Many individuals confuse the one-year notification requirement with the obligation to give notice promptly, and assume one replaces the other. Not so. It is entirely feasible to provide notice of the loss within a year but still fail to meet the prompt notice requirement. Nevertheless, Texas law requires that for an insurance carrier to deny coverage due to late notice, they must demonstrate that the delay prejudiced their ability to adjust the claim. This burden of proof is often quite challenging for carriers to meet. As a result, for claims tied to policies lacking a one-year reporting requirement, there is effectively no hard deadline for providing the first notice of loss. In many instances, carriers can receive notice many years after the incident, and if they are unable to establish that they were prejudiced by the delay, the timeliness of the notice will not adversely affect coverage for the damages in question.
This confusion arises from the misconception surrounding the timelines for providing first notice of loss and the deadlines tied to filing a lawsuit, formally known as the statute of limitations. Although both aspects are critical to the insurance process, they fulfill different roles. Most insurance policies contain provisions stating that a lawsuit must be initiated against the insurance company within two years from the date the loss or damage took place. However, this language is invalid and cannot be enforced in the state of Texas. To account for this, nearly every policy includes a “Texas Changes” endorsement that modifies the “suit against us” clause to stipulate that legal action must be initiated “two years and one day from the date we first breach the policy.” This revised language is valid and enforceable. Moreover, policies that incorporate the one-year notice requirement typically also contain language indicating that legal action must be taken within “three years from the date the loss or damage occurs.” This stipulation is also valid and enforceable.
Therefore, in Texas, the statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit against an insurer can be either:
(1) two years and one day from the date when the insurer first breaches the policy
(2) three years from the date the damages occurred (relevant only if the policy includes this specific language).
Understanding the deadlines for filing an insurance claim in Texas is not a one-size-fits-all answer, as it depends on various factors such as the type of peril involved and the specific terms of the policy. The key takeaway is that providing the first notice of loss (FNOL) as soon as possible is crucial to avoid potential issues with late-notice defenses. While Texas law does not define “prompt” precisely, policyholders should adhere to the timelines outlined in their insurance contract, especially regarding special provisions like those for wind or hail damage. It’s also important to distinguish between the deadlines for filing a claim and the statute of limitations for suing an insurer. By carefully reviewing the terms of the policy and acting swiftly, policyholders can ensure that their claims are handled efficiently and that their coverage remains intact.
Have questions about a claim? Please reach out to us for a free claim review.
